Search This Blog

Pages

About Me

My photo
19 years old. Homeschooled, then went to a community college instead of high school. Currently at Hampshire College. http://www.facebook.com/NamelessWonderBand http://myspace.com/namelesswondermusic http://youtube.com/namelesswonderband http://twitter.com/NamelessWonder7 http://www.youtube.com/dervine7 http://ted.com/profiles/778985

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Old Credo

This is something I wrote up for a church "Coming of Age" project about a year ago. Some of the stuff still holds, some of it doesn't, but I thought it would make a good intro to this adventure in blogging:

I believe that nothing can be known with absolute certainty. I am a skeptic and aknowlege that everything I know is known only through my senses and my opininions, which may be deceiving me.
I call myself an “Athgnostic”, sort of a cross between an agnostic and an atheist. I don’t, in my heart, believe in god and, more and more, I don’t feel a desire for god, which is how I am an Atheist. However, I intellectually acknowledge room, and quite a lot room, in fact, for doubt about gods non-existence, which is how I am an agnostic. But I don’t believe or want there to be one.
I’m doubting more and more the existence of an afterlife, not only because of evidence (which is ambiguous on both sides of the debate), but also because I am wondering whether there even needs to be one. As I believe Buddha said, and Hume definitely said (as long as I trust my philosophy textbook), and that I first came across in a book by Richard Dawkins, we are not the same person as we were, say, 10 years ago, especially someone like me who is 15 and ten years ago was 5. So then, in a way, who we were 10 years ago is dead, and our biological death is only the next step in that cycle of change.
I believe in a spirituality based science. Science can satisfy the spiritual need. Imagine: everything we know was once compressed into a dense point of matter; everything was once indistuingishable from everything else, was once all one and the same. The theory of evolution says that all creatured evolved from a common ancestor. We are attempting to find the “theory of everything”. That is what science continues, over and over, to discover: that everything, if one searches hard enough, eventually reduces to one substance, ancestor, principle. Everything is, in a sense, one, and in, to me, a much more majestic sense then having all been created by one Judeo-Christian god 6,000 years ago, or any other god. At any other time. I believe this furnishes a sense of empathy towards all other things and people, and a realization that we are no more important, ultimately, then anything else. The human race, if it wants to be important, has to make itself important, and the best and most reliable way that we can insure that we will have the opportunity to do so is by protecting our own existence, and, because of the SCIENTIFC laws of nature, in order to protect our own existence we must protect the existence of what is around us.
I believe the best way to do so that we know of so far is through Utilitarian ethics, the belief, as I interpret it for my own, that what is right is what causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of beings, what is wrong is what does the opposite. Sometimes we must cause imediate pain, sometimes great, in order to reach this goal. I believe in the golden rule.
I believe that this eliminates the need for blame or the concept of evil. I think what we consider evil (and also what we consider good) is only a combination of people’s disposition and upbringing. Instead of people being evil, they could be considered harmful in the Utilitarian sense of causing pain, and therefore not punished for being evil, but worked with (sometimes including punishment) to hopefully make them, not only less harmful, but hopefully beneficial.
I believe that it is my purpose in life to make and help people examine their won beliefs because I cannot prove that their beliefs are true or false, but I can show with certainty that they are self-contradictory. My hope, that I will never fulfill because I am human, is that I can learn not tto care what people believe as long as their beliefs are self-consistent and aren’t detrimental to an application of Utilitarianism.
I also think it is my purpose to be a UU evangelist. I mean evangelist in the literal sense of the word, in that I want to be someone who spreads the message of UU, and draws people to it. Actually, to be honest, my goal is to become rich and famous so everyone knows about me and, knowing I’m UU, become UU themselves. My hope is to do this though music, film, and other art, and possibly books explaining UU. I do believe that it is the religion that best suits me and that, at the risk of tootling UU’s horn, if more people were UU or followed its ideals (I say ideals instead of principles because the principles, in my opinion, are imperfect and secondary), the world would be a better place

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello,
i don't believe i know you but i have to write a credo for coa myself and was feeling a bit stuck. i took a day off of school to help me to formulate all my feelings. I really like your credo and it has helped me to get the words out


thank you so much
u seem like an awesome person
-n

Dervine7 said...

That's awesome! Thanks for the comment!

Dervine7 said...

(It makes me feel really good to know)